Russian hacking – yes, that Russian hacking, which we heard about from President Obama and the Clinton campaign – seems to be fake news. Essentially every mainstream news outlet has published this particular fake news item, with little or no warning that it is fake or at best questionable. Just search Google News for “Russian hack” and look at the variety of media stories to see how many carried a warning about how questionable the story is.
Here’s the basis of calling it fake news, from an article in the Washington Times:
Craig Murray, a former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, said in the report by the Daily Mail that he flew to Washington for a clandestine handoff with one of the email sources in September.
He said he received a package in a wooded area near American University.
“Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians,” Mr. Murray told the British newspaper. “The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.”
These videos are a reminder of dark days and political struggles in our recent past. With Trump in the White House flogging a failing economy and encouraging further destruction of our already degraded environment, we’re going to have more dark days. We’ve been through hard times before, and yet we’ve built movements and had some victories.
Sorry for any commercials that YouTube puts before the videos. Just click past those when you can, and don’t buy any washing machines you don’t need.
Where Have All The Flowers Gone?
Climate change denial has several forms. Some are not as easy to recognize as Donald Trump’s. With the Donald, denial is obvious and even overt. “It’s just a Chinese hoax!” is, if not an exact quote, at least a very accurate paraphrase. Whether the other Republicans all blame the Chinese or not, many of them say they do not “believe in” climate change, or at least do not believe that it is caused by the actions of mankind.
There’s also a form that does not outright deny climate change, but ends up with exactly the same policy prescriptions as outright deniers. A good example of this is Rex Tillerson, current Chair of Exxon-Mobil and possibly the next United States Secretary of State. At the 2015 shareholder’s meeting, he explained his take on climate. He said that he did not think the results of climate models were sufficiently reliable for policy making and, in any case, his view is that technical and engineering solutions will be found to overcome all impacts, as has been the case in the past. In other words, with simple faith in scientific progress for the future, we can simply ignore climate change in the present. It’s not direct denial, it’s indirect. We can study the subject, but there’s no need to come to any conclusion or take any action based on that study. Continue reading
The Detroit Free Press, on November 29, 2016, ran a story about the cost of the recount. In it various state officials express concern over the possible cost to taxpayers. Secretary of State Ruth Johnson, in this story, estimated the cost as $1.8 million, only half of which would be covered by the filing fee Jill Stein paid. She has since gone on to inflate that figure to $4 million.
A variety of public figures have thrown out their personal wild guesses of the cost; $4 million, $8 million, $12 million, who knows? Since none of them will be held responsible for the accuracy of their figure, any number they pull out of their back pocket is apparently good. Continue reading
The Flint Water Crisis is still ongoing, and is a shameful stain on our state. In January 2016, I decided to research the crisis and create a documentary for my radio show The Offensive Feminist with Jenny K. My initial thought of a 15 minute video slowly turned into just over an hour’s worth of information. Little did I realize when I started looking into this crisis the depth of public information that shows not only that our government knew Flint’s treatment plant could not properly treat water, but that it was spelled out as early as 2009 in the initial planning report of the KWA pipeline. Both Republicans and Democrats have blood on their hands in Flint. Please watch, share, and help end the misinformation still being spread and reported about the Flint Water Crisis. The people of Flint still need our help.
Click here to view the documentary
Click here to view all documents used as sources
White House petititon to provide citizenship to all undocumented people living in Flint since the Crisis began
Click here to follow the show on Facebook
Jennifer V. Kurland
By now we have all seen multiple absurd, fantastic and incomprehensible explanations for the recent Presidential election results. There’s been an astounding amount of unsupportable excuses from the losing side and an equally astounding amount of bloviating smugness from the “winners.” One thing that’s clear is that both the Donald and the Hillary were extremely disliked, extremely detached from ordinary Americans and extremely unlikely to change the society or the economy for the better.
I’ve come across a few articles that offer substantial insight into the election. This is one of them: http://cassandralegacy.blogspot.com/2016/12/the-peak-oil-election.html
I roughly agree with this line of analysis. I especially agree with the idea that most people trying to analyze the election are not even familiar with peak oil and therefore do not understand, for instance, why it means the political policies of the New Deal will not restore prosperity to the American economy. Neither will “free trade” as exemplified by a series of trade treaties. Neither will restoration of punitive tariffs as proposed by Trump. Whether you think America was great during Roosevelt’s administration or Reagan’s or Bill Clinton’s, the prosperity that was possible with ample resources for all human needs is simply no longer possible because essential resources are no longer ample. Continue reading